Ethiopia’s Airplane Mishap Examination Bureau (AIB) launched its initial report on the crash of Ethiopian Airlines Flight ET302 on Thursday. Among the most confounding information to emerge from the 33- page file was the finding that the pilots effectively turned Boeing’s bothersome MCAS (Steering Attributes Enhancement System) off just to change it back on after the manual trim controls for the horizontal stabilizers didn’t work.

Approximately 3 minutes into the six-minute flight, the Captain asked the First Officer if he might by hand cut the rear stabilizer– by hand-cranking a trim wheel on the center console in between the 2 pilots– to point the aircraft’s nose up, the crash report stated.

Seconds later on, the First Officer responded that the manual trim control was not working, according to the report. This sped up the pilots’ re-engaging the automated system and might have eventually added to the flight’s death.

Find Out More: Boeing and Ethiopian detectives verify a malfunctioning sensing unit was set off on the 737 Max quickly prior to it crashed

According to air travel trade publication The Air Current, a trait from the Boeing 737’s past might have appeared on Ethiopian Airline Companies Flight302


The publication talked to previous Boeing flight control engineer Peter Lem me together with an Australian Boeing 737 pilot.

REUTERS/Jason Redmond

Both stated that pilots flying the older 737-200 were advised in training that if the aircraft’s horizontal stabilizer is slanted too far in the nose down position, the manual crank will not work while the control yoke is drawn back.

It’s details that has actually because been eliminated from the training handbooks of subsequent Boeing 737 generations.

Obviously, this phenomenon is an outcome of aerodynamic forces on the aircraft’s horizontal stabilizers that “efficiently immobilizes” the system that runs the control surface area, Lem me informed The Air Current. It’s an impact that worsens as the aircraft’s speed boosts.

The set of situations set out by Lem me and the unnamed 737 pilot uses to the years’s old 737-200, however it likewise sounds strangely comparable to those dealt with by Flight ET302

Boeing was not right away offered for remark.

The Ethiopian initial report did not designate causation for the crash that eliminated all 157 travelers and team.

Boeing is presently dealing with software application updates for the grounded 737 Max fleet.

The majority of the updates will be to MCAS.

To fit limit’s bigger, more fuel-efficient engines, Boeing needed to place the engine further forward and up. This modification interfered with the aircraft’s center of mass and triggered limit to tend to tip its nose up throughout flight, increasing the possibility of a stall. MCAS is developed to immediately neutralize that propensity and point the nose of the aircraft down when the aircraft’s angle-of-attack (AOA) sensing unit sets off a caution.

Click on this link to find out more about the Boeing 737 control problem at The Air Current