On Sunday, IBM CEO Ginni Rometty made a strong, head-turning claim about her business’s $34 billion offer to obtain open source software application maker Red Hat.

“The acquisition of Red Hat is a game-changer. It alters whatever about the cloud market,” Rometty stated, in a news release.

Embellishment and remarkable quotes in merger statements are barely uncommon. However IBM’s declaration about shocking the cloud market appeared a bit extreme even because context.

The cloud computing market is controlled by Amazon Web Solutions and Microsoft Azure– smaller sized gamers like Google and IBM are jockeying for position behind them. And while Red Hat makes software application that is popular with business utilizing those clouds, it is not itself a cloud computing company.

Simply put, it’s not as if IBM had actually all of a sudden purchased its method to beating Amazon in cloud market share.

So, then, what did Rometty suggest? I took the the concern to Arvind Krishna, the senior VP of IBM Hybrid Cloud, and Red Hat Executive VP Paul Cormier, in a brief phone interview on Monday.

Why IBM purchased Red Hat

“This is a typical method to both update things that are on-premise, and move things to do the general public cloud,” states Krishna.

Simply put, Krishna states, IBM sees Red Hat’s innovation– including its incredibly popular Red Hat Business Linux running system for servers and its OpenShift cloud application platform– as a method for its big-business clients to get their existing IT facilities as much as date, even as they prepare to move their information as much as the cloud.

This piecemeal method, called “hybrid cloud,” is just growing in appeal: Some services, specifically in managed markets like medication and financing, are under rigorous requirements for where their most delicate information gets kept. A hybrid design lets these business unload a minimum of a few of their most requiring supercomputing requirements as much as the so-called public cloud, while still eking worth from their existing servers.

Significantly, Red Hat has existing collaborations with all of the significant public cloud platforms, consisting of those from Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and, yes, IBM. However Krishna states that IBM has no strategies to end those relationships– in reality, it offers IBM an opportunity to “include worth to everybody” throughout all of those various clouds, he states, providing Huge Blue an in as huge business continue to embrace several platforms.

Which’s where IBM sees the Red Hat offer shocking the cloud market. With Red Hat’s software application so popular, and open source software application ending up being more important to the IT market as an entire, IBM sees this offer as making its innovation lineup vital for those lots of business making the leap into “hybrid cloud.” That might provide IBM a brand-new lease on life in the cloud computing video game, where it still lags.

Why Red Hat will be handled separately

This, then, is why Red Hat will preserve its self-reliance, states Cormier. He compares Red Hat to Switzerland– absolutely neutral in the continuous cloud wars. If IBM takes too heavy a hand with Red Hat, states Cormier, it would strain those collaborations, hence shooting itself in the foot.

“The method here is actually to keep it different,” Cormier states. While he states that Red Hat will gain from having access to IBM resources like its substantial sales force and consulting company, product-wise, RHEL and its other items need to continue dealing with all clouds, all over, otherwise danger losing its momentum.

Krishna and Cormier both state that they’re currently getting a great deal of concerns along these lines: Why would IBM pay $34 billion for Red Hat and keep it separate?

“It’s type of an amusing concern, because without that, there is no worth,” states Krishna.