As someone whose primary claim to fame is writing physics books starring a talking dog, I am obviously often on the lookout for pop-physics books that take a different slant on the subject. I ran across a couple of these recently, picking up the “serious comic on entanglement” *Totally Random: Why Nobody Understands Quantum Mechanics* by Tanya and Jeffrey Bub before a recent cruise vacation, and getting sent a review copy of the forthcoming *Anxiety and the Equation: Understanding Boltzmann’s Entropy* by Eric Johnson. Both of these offer somewhat non-traditional explorations of their respective subjects, in ways that have a bit more in common than their very different formats might suggest.

*Anxiety and the Equation* is the more conventionally unconventional of the two, if that makes sense, in that it departs from the simple explanatory format by including a serving of individual biography with the physics. This covers the life of Luwdig Boltzmann, with a particular focus on the mental issues that eventually led him to take his own life in 1906 (becoming part of a much-quoted caution to students studying statistical mechanics. While this isn’t the normal approach to explaining physics, it’s not all that uncommon– in some ways, Johnson is walking a path previously laid out by books like Graham Farmelo’s *The Strangest Man*.

Like Farmelo, who suggested that Paul Dirac may have been on the autism spectrum, Johnson engages in a bit of post-mortem diagnosis, suggesting that Boltzmann’s well-know “neuraesthenia” would, in modern terms, be classed as an anxiety disorder. This is laid out sympathetically in a set of interspersed chapters detailing Boltzmann’s struggles to navigate the academic politics of Europe in the 1800’s and deal with harsh criticisms of his work from Mach and other contemporaries who found the whole project of statistical physics distasteful. Some of these chapters, which attempt to get into Boltzmann’s head directly, have an almost poetic quality that’s unusual to see mixed with a straight pop-science explanation.

The writing in these sections is of high quality and very sympathetic to the subject, but doesn’t really overcome the inherent problems of trying to assess the mental state of someone who’s been dead for more than a century. The real strength of the book comes from its other half, which aims to unpack the equation for entropy, *S*=*k*log*W* that famously decorates Boltzmann’s grave. Boltzmann’s statistical understanding of entropy, while controversial during his lifetime, has had a transformational impact on the way we understand the universe.

Johnson’s discussion of Boltzmann’s equation (which is credited to him because he came up with the key concepts, though he never explicitly wrote it in the modern form) is anchored in extremely concrete discussions of random processes involving small numbers of particles, and calculating the likelihood of each of the “microstates” of these systems. Thanks to these examples of particles hopping between positions and energy states, he is able to put together one of the clearest explanations I’ve seen of what entropy is in a statistical sense, and how it functions. He even explains why it makes sense for a logarithm to appear, which I had never seen before.

Johnson’s book is a slim volume of mostly prose, and as such does not physically resemble the Bubs’ book on quantum entanglement, which is a moderately large graphic explanation. Format aside, though, the two share a crucial structural element: like Johnson’s explanation of entropy, the Bubs’ exploration of entanglement centers on a simple and concrete system of “quoins,” quantum-entangled coins whose distribution of heads and tails when flipped follow unusual rules. Working through all of the implications of these “quoin” flips grounds an exploration of a wide range of modern quantum physics, from Bell’s theorem to quantum teleportation.

The structure of *Totally Random* is a radical departure from the usual, though, featuring asides from the author and a sort of quasi-first-person graphic presentation. It verges on hallucinatory at times, especially in surreal sequences involving versions of Niels Bohr, Wolfgang Pauli, Erwin Schrödinger and a sort of cackling trickster version of Hugh Everett of Many-Worlds fame. These draw heavily on the writings of the principal figures to inform the dialogue, something I recognized right off because I’ve read a lot of this stuff, but might just sound weird to a reader less familiar with the subject.

These interludes give the whole thing a sort of impressionist feel that on the one hand makes a subject I’ve read maybe too many pop treatments of feel fresh, and really captures the strangeness. On the other hand, though, I’m not completely confident that it will convey all that much information to people who don’t already know a bit about what they’re saying. Reading as a physicist, I found it full of fun moments as I realized “Oh, they’re doing *this*…” but absent those it might’ve just seemed weird.

That said, the “quoin”-flipping examples are really outstanding for illustrating the key experiments involved in modern quantum physics, particularly when it gets to the later examples of applications to cryptography and teleportation. I’m not sure I’d recommend this to a total neophyte, but backing up this graphic treatment with a more traditionally wordy one (if you like dogs, have I got a recommendation for you…) might be really effective.

Both of these books taught me a few things about physics and how to explain it that hadn’t fully clicked before, and for that alone, I’m glad to have read them. I also appreciate their experiments with the form in which this material is presented– it’s great to see that even a hundred years after the development of statistical and quantum mechanics, physicists and physics writers are still finding new ways to talk about these fields.

” readability=”104.313881962″>

< div _ ngcontent-c15=
"" innerhtml="

As somebody whose main specialty is composing physics books starring a talking pet dog, I am undoubtedly typically on the lookout for pop-physics books that take a various slant on the topic. I encountered a few these just recently, getting the “severe comic on entanglement” * Completely Random: Why No One Comprehends Quantum Mechanics* by Tanya and Jeffrey Bub prior to a current cruise holiday, and getting sent out an evaluation copy of the upcoming * Stress And Anxiety and the Formula: Comprehending Boltzmann’s Entropy* by Eric Johnson. Both of these deal rather non-traditional expeditions of their particular topics, in manner ins which have a bit more in typical than their really various formats may recommend.

* Stress And Anxiety and the Formula* is the more traditionally non-traditional of the 2, if that makes good sense, because it leavings from the easy explanatory format by consisting of a serving of private bio with the physics. This covers the life of Luwdig Boltzmann, with a specific concentrate on the psychological problems that ultimately led him to take his own life in 1906 (entering into a much-quoted care to trainees studying analytical mechanics. While this isn’t really the regular method to discussing physics, it’s not all that unusual– in some methods, Johnson is strolling a course formerly set out by books like Graham Farmelo’s * The Strangest Male*

Like Farmelo, who recommended that Paul Dirac might have been on the autism spectrum, Johnson participates in a little post-mortem medical diagnosis, recommending that Boltzmann’s well-know “neuraesthenia” would, in modern-day terms, be classified as a stress and anxiety condition. This is set out affectionately in a set of sprinkled chapters detailing Boltzmann’s battles to browse the scholastic politics of Europe in the 1800’s and handle extreme criticisms of his work from Mach and other contemporaries who discovered the entire job of analytical physics horrible. A few of these chapters, which try to obtain into Boltzmann’s head straight, have a nearly poetic quality that’s uncommon to see combined with a straight pop-science description.

(************** )The composing in these areas is of high quality and really supportive to the topic, however does not truly conquer the intrinsic issues of attempting to evaluate the frame of mind of somebody who’s been dead for more than a century. The genuine strength of the book originates from its partner, which intends to unload the formula for entropy, * S* =-LRB- *********************) k log* W* that notoriously embellishes Boltzmann’s tomb. Boltzmann’s analytical understanding of entropy, while questionable throughout his life time, has actually had a transformational influence on the method we comprehend deep space.

Johnson’s conversation of Boltzmann’s formula (which is credited to him since he developed the essential ideas, though he never ever clearly composed it in the modern-day type) is anchored in incredibly concrete conversations of random procedures including little numbers of particles, and determining the possibility of each of the “microstates” of these systems. Thanks to these examples of particles hopping in between positions and energy states, he has the ability to assemble among the clearest descriptions I have actually seen of exactly what entropy remains in an analytical sense, and how it works. He even discusses why it makes good sense for a logarithm to appear, which I had actually never ever seen prior to.

Johnson’s book is a slim volume of primarily prose, and as such does not physically look like the Bubs’ book on quantum entanglement, which is a reasonably big graphic description. Format aside, however, the 2 share an essential structural component: like Johnson’s description of entropy, the Bubs’ expedition of entanglement centers on an easy and concrete system of “quoins,” quantum-entangled coins whose circulation of heads and tails when turned follow uncommon guidelines. Resolving all the ramifications of these “quoin” turns premises an expedition of a large range of modern-day quantum physics, from Bell’s theorem to quantum teleportation.

The structure of * Completely Random* is an extreme departure from the normal, however, including asides from the author and a sort of quasi-first-person graphic discussion. It borders on imaginary sometimes, particularly in surreal series including variations of Niels Bohr, Wolfgang Pauli, Erwin SchrÃ¶dinger and a sort of babbling trickster variation of Hugh Everett of Many-Worlds popularity. These draw greatly on the works of the primary figures to notify the discussion, something I acknowledged straight off since I have actually checked out a great deal of this things, however may simply sound unusual to a reader less knowledgeable about the topic.

These interludes provide the entire thing a sort of impressionist feel that on the one hand makes a subject I have actually checked out perhaps a lot of pop treatments of feel fresh, and truly records the strangeness. On the other hand, however, I’m not entirely positive that it will communicate all that much info to individuals who do not currently understand a bit about exactly what they’re stating. Checking out as a physicist, I discovered it filled with enjoyable minutes as I understood “Oh, they’re doing * this* …” however missing those it may’ve simply appeared unusual.

That stated, the “quoin”- turning examples are truly impressive for highlighting the essential experiments associated with modern-day quantum physics, especially when it gets to the later examples of applications to cryptography and teleportation. I’m not exactly sure I ‘d advise this to an overall neophyte, however supporting this graphic treatment with a more typically verbose one (if you like pet dogs, have I got a suggestion for you …) may be truly efficient.

Both of these books taught me a couple of aspects of physics and ways to describe it that had not totally clicked previously, and for that alone, I’m happy to have actually read them. I likewise value their try outs the type where this product exists– it’s excellent to see that even a century after the advancement of analytical and quantum mechanics, physicists and physics authors are still discovering brand-new methods to discuss these fields.

” readability =”104

313881962″ >

As somebody whose main specialty is composing physics books starring a talking pet dog, I am undoubtedly typically on the lookout for pop-physics books that take a various slant on the topic. I encountered a few these just recently, getting the “severe comic on entanglement” * Completely Random: Why No One Comprehends Quantum Mechanics * by Tanya and Jeffrey Bub prior to a current cruise holiday, and getting sent out an evaluation copy of the upcoming * Stress And Anxiety and the Formula: Comprehending Boltzmann’s Entropy * by Eric Johnson. Both of these deal rather non-traditional expeditions of their particular topics, in manner ins which have a bit more in typical than their really various formats may recommend.

* Stress And Anxiety and the Formula * is the more traditionally non-traditional of the 2, if that makes good sense, because it leavings from the easy explanatory format by consisting of a serving of private bio with the physics. This covers the life of Luwdig Boltzmann, with a specific concentrate on the psychological problems that ultimately led him to take his own life in 1906 (entering into a much-quoted care to trainees studying analytical mechanics. While this isn’t really the regular method to discussing physics, it’s not all that unusual– in some methods, Johnson is strolling a course formerly set out by books like Graham Farmelo’s * The Strangest Male *

.

Like Farmelo, who recommended that Paul Dirac might have been on the autism spectrum, Johnson participates in a little post-mortem medical diagnosis, recommending that Boltzmann’s well-know “neuraesthenia” would, in modern-day terms, be classified as a stress and anxiety condition. This is set out affectionately in a set of sprinkled chapters detailing Boltzmann’s battles to browse the scholastic politics of Europe in the 1800’s and handle extreme criticisms of his work from Mach and other contemporaries who discovered the entire job of analytical physics horrible. A few of these chapters, which try to obtain into Boltzmann’s head straight, have a nearly poetic quality that’s uncommon to see combined with a straight pop-science description.

The composing in these areas is of high quality and really supportive to the topic, however does not truly conquer the intrinsic issues of attempting to evaluate the frame of mind of somebody who’s been dead for more than a century. The genuine strength of the book originates from its partner, which intends to unload the formula for entropy, * S * =-LRB- *********************) k log * W * that notoriously embellishes Boltzmann’s tomb. Boltzmann’s analytical understanding of entropy, while questionable throughout his life time, has actually had a transformational influence on the method we comprehend deep space.

Johnson’s conversation of Boltzmann’s formula (which is credited to him since he developed the essential ideas, though he never ever clearly composed it in the modern-day type) is anchored in incredibly concrete conversations of random procedures including little numbers of particles, and determining the possibility of each of the “microstates” of these systems. Thanks to these examples of particles hopping in between positions and energy states, he has the ability to assemble among the clearest descriptions I have actually seen of exactly what entropy remains in an analytical sense, and how it works. He even discusses why it makes good sense for a logarithm to appear, which I had actually never ever seen prior to.

Johnson’s book is a slim volume of primarily prose, and as such does not physically look like the Bubs’ book on quantum entanglement, which is a reasonably big graphic description. Format aside, however, the 2 share an essential structural component: like Johnson’s description of entropy, the Bubs’ expedition of entanglement centers on an easy and concrete system of “quoins,” quantum-entangled coins whose circulation of heads and tails when turned follow uncommon guidelines. Resolving all the ramifications of these “quoin” turns premises an expedition of a large range of modern-day quantum physics, from Bell’s theorem to quantum teleportation.

The structure of * Completely Random * is an extreme departure from the normal, however, including asides from the author and a sort of quasi-first-person graphic discussion. It borders on imaginary sometimes, particularly in surreal series including variations of Niels Bohr, Wolfgang Pauli, Erwin SchrÃ¶dinger and a sort of babbling trickster variation of Hugh Everett of Many-Worlds popularity. These draw greatly on the works of the primary figures to notify the discussion, something I acknowledged straight off since I have actually checked out a great deal of this things, however may simply sound unusual to a reader less knowledgeable about the topic.

These interludes provide the entire thing a sort of impressionist feel that on the one hand makes a subject I have actually checked out perhaps a lot of pop treatments of feel fresh, and truly records the strangeness. On the other hand, however, I’m not entirely positive that it will communicate all that much info to individuals who do not currently understand a bit about exactly what they’re stating. Checking out as a physicist, I discovered it filled with enjoyable minutes as I understood “Oh, they’re doing * this * …” however missing those it may’ve simply appeared unusual.

That stated, the “quoin” – turning examples are truly impressive for highlighting the essential experiments associated with modern-day quantum physics, especially when it gets to the later examples of applications to cryptography and teleportation. I’m not exactly sure I ‘d advise this to an overall neophyte, however supporting this graphic treatment with a more typically verbose one (if you like pet dogs, have I got a suggestion for you …) may be truly efficient.

Both of these books taught me a couple of aspects of physics and ways to describe it that had not totally clicked previously, and for that alone, I’m happy to have actually read them. I likewise value their try outs the type where this product exists– it’s excellent to see that even a century after the advancement of analytical and quantum mechanics, physicists and physics authors are still discovering brand-new methods to discuss these fields.