Elon Musk’s tweets have actually gotten him in problem with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) once again.

The SEC stated Tesla’s CEO misinformed financiers with a tweet recently about the business’s anticipated vehicle-production targets. What’s more, the company stated since Musk didn’t get preapproval of the tweet by Tesla, he remains in offense of the regards to a settlement he and the SEC reached last fall, and it asked a judge to hold him in contempt of the federal court that authorized that settlement.

“Musk did not look for or get pre-approval previous to releasing this tweet, which was incorrect and shared to over 24 million individuals,” the SEC stated in a filing with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York City. “Musk has actually hence broken the court’s last judgment by participating in the very conduct that the pre- approval arrangement of the last judgment was developed to avoid.”

A Tesla agent decreased talk about the SEC filing.

On Tuesday afternoon, Musk stated on Twitter that Tesla would produce 500,000 automobiles this year— a number that was far above its previous projections. 4 hours later on, he modified himself, stating that the business in fact still approximates it will produce just 400,000 automobiles this year, however that it anticipates to be producing them at a 500,000- automobile rate by the end of the year.

Tesla didn’t preaprove Musk’s tweet

The fault appeared bothersome, and not even if financiers might have traded on the incorrect number Musk offered initially. Musk had actually concurred last fall to have his interactions with investors– including his tweets– pre-approved by a business legal representative as part of his settlement with the SEC.

Read this: Elon Musk’s tweets make it appear like Tesla’s revamped board is still bad at its task– and it might get the business into a lot more problem

In correspondence with the SEC, Bradley Bondi, who represents Tesla as a legal representative for Cahill Gordon & Reindell, acknowledged that Musk had not gotten pre-approval of his very first production-related tweet recently, however argued that wasn’t an issue.

“Although the [first] tweet was not separately pre-approved, Mr. Musk thought that the compound had actually currently been properly vetted, pre-approved, and openly shared,” Bondi stated. “Additionally, the tweet was made beyond NASDAQ trading hours.”

However the SEC was having none of it. The policies Tesla put in location at the company’s wish as part of last fall’s settlement clearly need the business to pre-approve all of his interactions with investors worrying details that’s “product” to the business, the company stated in its filing. Those policies name Musk as an individual at the business whose interactions require to be preapproved and they specify that tweets are amongst the interactions that require preapproval, the company stated. And it was “clear” that the variety of automobiles Tesla would produce this year was material details, it stated.

“The arrangement of the Court’s Last Judgment needing Musk to acquire pre- approval prior to releasing composed declarations consisting of product details about Tesla is clear and unambiguous,” the company stated.

Musk’s tweet was ‘undoubtedly various’ from Tesla’s previous declarations

In his letter, Bondi stated Musk believed he was simply reiterating production details the business had actually launched 20 days previously in its fourth-quarter report. That details– that included the 500,000- automobile year-end run rate– had actually been vetted and authorized by business legal representatives, he stated.

However Tesla’s own policies now need interactions to be reapproved by its lawyers if they are more than 2 days old even if they are a verbatim restatement of a previous communique, the SEC stated. And Musk’s very first tweet wasn’t a verbatim restatement, the company stated.

“Musk’s claim that he believed he was just reiterating details from the January 30 interactions is not trustworthy,” the company stated. “Musk is the CEO of Tesla and certainly knowledgeable about the information of Tesla’s production forecasts,” it included, stating that the very first tweet was “undoubtedly various” from Tesla’s formerly mentioned production targets.

Even beyond recently’s tweets, Musk hasn’t been making a “excellent faith” effort to abide by the settlement arrangement, the company stated. It indicated his interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes” in December in which he stated the he appreciates the justice system, he didn’t appreciate the SEC and his tweets weren’t being examined prior to he published them. Although that interview occurred prior to the settlement terms worked, they show that Musk had no objective to follow them, the company stated.

Undoubtedly, there’s no sign that even after the settlement worked that Musk has actually “looked for or gotten” Tesla’s approval of any of his tweets prior to he published them, the SEC stated.

“While Musk claims to ‘appreciate the justice system,’ his purposeful indifference to compliance with this court’s last judgment suggests otherwise,” the company stated.

Musk initially got in problem for his ‘financing protected’ tweets

Musk and Tesla’s settlements with the SEC were an outgrowth of his notorious tweets last August that he had actually “moneying protected” for taking the electrical automobile maker personal at a cost of $420 a share. The company charged that the tweets were deceptive since he didn’t in fact have a financing arrangement in location for such a deal.

As part of the settlements, Musk and Tesla each accepted pay the SEC a fine of $20 million and to put in location a series of governance reforms and brand-new policies over interactions with investors.

Even under SEC examination, Musk continues to tweet with relatively little restraint. On Monday, he published 2 memes, one recommending that the only individual he seeks advice from is himself and another unusual one about him chuckling. He published the latter after the SEC submitted its file implicating him of contempt.