The Securities and Exchange Commission, in a court filing on Monday, stated a tweet Elon Musk released in February was a “outright infraction” of a $40 million court settlement that needs Tesla to designate a “Twitter czar” who would veterinarian his tweets for info product to the business prior to publishing.

The SEC submitted a contempt-of-court claim versus Musk over a February 19 tweet in which Musk stated Tesla would produce 500,000 cars in2019 Musk remedied the tweet about Tesla car production hours after he sent it.

The Twitter czar was expected to avoid the Tesla CEO from tweeting info about the electrical carmaker that might unduly rattle the marketplace. That order comes from a settlement reached in between the SEC and Tesla in September over Musk’s now-infamous “financing protected” tweet in 2015 in which he stated he was prepared to take the business personal. Both Tesla and Musk were bought to pay $20 million each in restitution.

Tesla carried out a brand-new policy governing interactions amongst its senior executives as part of the settlement.

Learn More: MUSK FILES HIS DEFENSE: States SEC looks for to breach his First Modification rights and its filing ‘resembles retaliation and censorship’

The SEC implicates Musk of stopping working to have his tweets vetted and, rather, “unilaterally” choosing what is material info.

“The preapproval requirement was created to secure versus negligent conduct by Musk moving forward,” the SEC stated in its filing on Monday. “It is for that reason sensational to find out that, at the time of filing of the instantaneous movement, Musk had actually not looked for pre-approval for a single among the various tweets about Tesla he released in the months given that the Court-ordered pre-approval policy entered into impact.”

It continues: “Musk’s moving reasons recommend that there was never ever any excellent faith effort to abide by the Court’s order and the Tesla Policy. Rather, Musk has actually just chosen to disregard them.”

This is the current advancement in a continuous disagreement in between Musk and the SEC. The Tesla CEO has actually not been coy about his contempt for the regulative company that he formerly called the “Shortseller Enrichment Commission.”

Legal professionals mentioned by Reuters state the SEC still has a variety of treatments it can pursue if the Musk settlement goes south. Those might consist of greater fines versus Musk and tighter constraints on his activities.