The United States federal government has a caution for critics of the Federal Trade Commission’s $5 billion settlement with Facebook over personal privacy concerns: Do not be so sure a much better result is possible.

The FTC just recently reached a multi-billion dollar settlement with the Californian social networks giant over declared offenses of a 2011 approval order worrying its handling of users’ information. It’s a record-breaking fine– however critics have actually argued that it is eventually inefficient, totaling up to just a portion of Facebook’s yearly earnings, and it’s not accompanied by anymore basic structural modifications to the business’s organisation design.

The Electronic Personal Privacy Info Center (IMPRESSIVE), a privacy-focused non-profit company, is one such critic. It submitted a movement to intervene in the event, arguing the settlement “is not appropriate, affordable, or suitable”– and now United States federal government legal representatives are countering.

In a court filing on Monday, United States lawyers argue that IMPRESSIVE is looking for “to step in to put itself in the federal government’s shoes due to the fact that it wants the Stipulated Order were various.” They argue that IMPRESSIVE does not have appropriate premises to get associated with the case, and likewise make an intriguing argument regarding the dangers of any such meddling from 3rd parties.

“Competing that ‘[t] he proposed settlement stops working to secure the interests of Facebook users’ … IMPRESSIVE most likely desires the Court to decline the proposed settlement in favor of some other charge versus Facebook that would– in IMPRESSIVE’s viewpoint– secure Facebook users’ interests,” the filing checks out.

“However it is pure guesswork that turning down the proposed settlement would result in a various or much better result that would ‘secure the interests of Facebook users’ in the way IMPRESSIVE’s chooses. Undoubtedly, turning down the settlement might yield several other results in lawsuits or later on settlement far even worse for customers.”

To put it simply, the United States federal government is arguing: If the settlement litigated the supreme result may be considerably even worse for common customers than it is now.

To be sure, there’s constantly a threat when you pick to prosecute a matter in court. However it deserves keeping in mind that the settlement the FTC eventually struck with Facebook is significantly weaker than choices that were at one point being thought about. The FTC checked out the possibility of fining Facebook 10s of billions of dollars, and holding CEO Mark Zuckerberg personally liable, however that did not eventually occur.

Got an idea? Contact this press reporter by means of encrypted messaging app Signal at +1 (650) 636-6268 utilizing a non-work phone, e-mail at rprice@businessinsider.com, Telegram or WeChat at robaeprice, or Twitter DM at @robaeprice (PR pitches by e-mail just, please.) You can likewise contact Company Expert firmly by means of SecureDrop

Learn More: