Diana Parno’s head swam when she first stepped inside the large, metallic vessel of the experiment KATRIN. Inside the house-sized, rectangular construction, every little thing was symmetrical, clear and blindingly shiny, says Parno, a physicist at Carnegie Mellon College in Pittsburgh. “It was extremely disorienting.”

Now, electrons — fortunately resistant to bouts of dizziness — traverse the within of this zeppelin-shaped monstrosity situated in Karlsruhe, Germany. Constructing the experiment took years and tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars}. Why create such an excessive equipment? It’s all a part of a bid to measure the mass of itty-bitty subatomic particles referred to as neutrinos.

KATRIN, which is brief for Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino Experiment, began check runs in Could. The experiment is a part of a multipronged method to the examine of particle physics, one in all dozens of detectors in-built an assortment of odd-looking sizes and styles. Their mission: dive deep into the usual mannequin, particle physicists’ idea of the subatomic constructing blocks of matter — and possibly overthrow it.

Developed within the 1960s and ’70s, the usual mannequin has some sizable holes: It could possibly’t clarify darkish matter — an ethereal substance up to now detected solely by its gravitational results — or darkish vitality, a mysterious oomph that causes the cosmos to increase at an rising price. The speculation additionally can’t clarify why the universe is made principally of matter, whereas antimatter is uncommon (SN: 9/2/17, p. 15). So physicists are on a quest to revamp particle physics by probing the usual mannequin’s weak factors.

Main services just like the Giant Hadron Collider — the gargantuan accelerator situated at CERN close to Geneva — haven’t but discovered the place the usual mannequin goes mistaken (SN: 10/1/16, p. 12). As a substitute, particle physics experiments have confirmed commonplace mannequin predictions many times. “In some sense we’re victims of our personal success,” says Juan Rojo, a theoretical physicist at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. “We don’t have hints about what’s the subsequent step.”

New experiments like KATRIN would possibly be capable of ferret out solutions. Additionally becoming a member of the ranks are Muon g-2 (pronounced “gee minus two”) at Fermilab in Batavia, Ailing., and Belle II in Tsukuba, Japan. A behind-the-scenes take a look at these experiments reveals the sweat, pleasure and sacrifice that goes into every of those tough enterprises. These efforts contain a whole lot of researchers, sport value tags within the tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} and require main technological undertakings: intricate electronics, highly effective magnets and ultraclean circumstances. Researchers have constructed complicated apparatuses with their very own arms, lugged tons of kit throughout continents and cleaned the insides of detectors till they gleam.

Right here’s a glimpse at three of the newest commonplace mannequin challengers.

Belle II

KEK Excessive Power Accelerator Analysis Group
Tsukuba, Japan
Approximate price: $50 million

1. An accelerator sends electrons from one finish and positrons from the opposite into Belle II.

2. Monitoring detectors comply with particles’ paths after collision, pinpointing B mesons.

3. Quartz sensors distinguish between comparable varieties of particles.

4. A calorimeter measures energies of particles.

5. Outer layers spot particles that get previous interior sections.

OK, however why?

Sure B mesons appear to desire to decay into electrons, somewhat than their heavier cousins, muons (SN: 5/13/17, p. 16). That goes towards the usual mannequin, which says electrons and muons ought to seem in equal quantities. If this sudden habits holds as much as scrutiny, one thing large have to be mistaken with the idea. B mesons additionally partake in a course of referred to as CP violation, by which antimatter and matter don’t behave like excellent mirror pictures.

Learning CP violation would possibly assist scientists perceive why the universe consists of matter and never antimatter. Within the Huge Bang, matter and antimatter had been produced in equal measure and will have annihilated into nothingness, however one way or the other matter gained an higher hand. It’s “probably the most elementary query human beings can ask … ‘Why are we right here?’ ” says physics graduate pupil Robert Seddon.

electrons cruise via KATRIN’s blimp-shaped tank and are detected on the different finish (SN On-line: 10/18/16). The tank, a spectrometer, divvies up the particles in line with their energies. Some vitality from every tritium decay goes to producing the antineutrino’s mass. That limits how a lot vitality the electron will get. So measuring the electrons’ energies can reveal the mass of neutrinos. KATRIN ought to formally begin taking information subsequent spring.

1. Tritium decays, releasing electrons and antineutrinos, which escape.

2. Electrons journey alongside beamline to spectrometer.

3. The spectrometer types electrons by their energies.

COMING HOME KATRIN’s spectrometer was constructed off-site and needed to be rigorously transported to the lab in Germany, simply squeezing between close by homes.

Muon g-2

Fermilab, Batavia, Ailing.
Approximate price: $46 million

1. Muons enter the magnet.

2. Muons circle in the identical route repeatedly.

3. Muons decay into positrons, that are picked up by detectors that measure vitality and particle tracks.

OK, however why?

Transient particles blip out and in of existence in all places in house. These particles tweak the speed at which the muons gyrate. If undetected particles are on the market, Muon g-2’s measurement may not sq. with predictions. The same experiment carried out at Brookhaven Nationwide Laboratory in Upton, N.Y., within the 1990s hinted at a mismatch (SN: 2/17/01, p. 102). Muon g-2 will make a extra exact measurement to comply with up on that lead.

One ring

Muon g-2’s magnetic area is about 30,000 instances as sturdy as Earth’s magnetic area. Such power is helpful provided that the magnetic area is ultrauniform. So physicists strategically positioned 1000’s of tiny metallic shims — many only a fraction of the thickness of pocket book paper — to regulate the magnetic area. Hours of “shimming” left physicists’ arms “lined in dust and oil and grease,” says physics graduate pupil Rachel Osofsky of the College of Washington in Seattle. The soiled job was price it: The magnetic area is now uniform to inside 0.0015 %.