There’s no lack of unusual beliefs out there, and not all of them include having a company grip on truth. However it’s genuinely strange to see one from the latter camp have an abrupt rise in appeal and attention centuries after we understood it was incorrect. However when it concerns the concept that the Earth is flat, centuries of building up proof do not make much of a distinction– its followers have centuries of history of overlooking it, in addition to a minimum of one not-nearly-as-famous-as-it-should-be circumstances of threatening a popular researcher along the method.
That was Alfred Russell Wallace, among the 2 co-developers of the theory of development.
This is our very first shot of a brand-new video format where we take a look at debates that, well, truly should not be questionable. While we might return to Wallace and his theory, for the many part we’re going to concentrate on cases where the inspiration for the debate is a bit less apparent. What drives individuals to think in concepts that are blatantly, undoubtedly separated from truth? Or to turn down ones that have a strong structure of proof?
The concept of a flat Earth is an excellent location to begin with this, considered that the proof for its round nature returns to long prior to the presence of science as an orderly activity. For numerous centuries, shock in the concept was most likely a mix of an absence of awareness and its look of flatness in daily experience. However it wasn’t too long after the concept of science took hold in the public that individuals were happily declaring that they ‘d acquired proof that the Earth was flat.
However researchers are a resourceful lot, and some have actually utilized that as a chance to study how human beings form their beliefs. So, we utilize this video to take a look at both the history of the belief and what might be driving it.