• Trump and his businesses are tangled in an array of state and federal investigations and lawsuits.
  • Georgia’s RICO indictment for election interference is from the last known criminal investigation into him.
  • His trial troubles in criminal and civil cases overlap with his 2024 presidential campaign.

The lawsuits and prosecutions involving Donald Trump are piling up. 

The ex-president — who is the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination — now is indicted in four separate prosecutions, the first former White House occupant to ever be charged. He faces 91 criminal counts overall.

In Atlanta, he and 18 co-defendants were charged in a sprawling RICO case for trying to overturn the election results in Georgia. The Justice Department brought a separate case against him in Washington, DC, for his election challenges. In Florida, the Justice Department brought 37 counts against him for his handling of classified documents after leaving the White House. And in New York, he stands charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Meanwhile, Trump is set to face a second defamation trial brought by E. Jean Carroll — the magazine writer who won a civil trial against Trump for sexual assault and defamation this past May.

And he faces a grab-bag of additional lawsuits that could financially harm him and his international real estate and golf resort empire.

Keep up to date on the latest of Trump’s legal travails with this guide to the ever-evolving Trump docket.

Indictments against Trump

Fani Willis  raises her eyebrows

Fulton County Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis investigated Trump’s interference in the 2020 election.


AP Photo/Ben Gray, File



The Georgia RICO case

The parties: Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, Trump, and his Republican associates 

The issues: In August, Willis brought a sprawling RICO case against Trump and 18 co-defendants, accusing them of forming an enterprise to illegally try to keep him in power even though he lost the 2020 election.

The indictment brings charges over campaigns from Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and other top Trump allies to pressure state officials to overturn the election results. It also brings charges against state Republican officials who acted as false electors and submitted fake documents to Congress.

What’s next: The case is the most complicated one pending against Trump and will likely be the last to go to trial. With 19 defendants overall — many of them lawyers — there are numerous legal issues to sort out. But with a potential 20-year sentence on RICO charges and no prospect of a preemptive pardon, the case is Trump’s biggest legal threat.

January 6

Trump has been investigated for his role in the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.


Jon Cherry/Getty Images



The Justice Department’s investigation into 2020 election interference

The parties: Justice Department Special Counsel Jack Smith brought an indictment against Trump in Washington, DC federal court.

The issues: The indictment alleges Trump and a group of yet-unindicted co-conspirators conspired to stop Congress from doing its duty to certify now-President Joe Biden’s electoral victory in the 2020 election and rob Americans of their lawful votes.

Smith’s indictment includes few details that weren’t already uncovered by reporters and from the congressional investigation into the pro-Trump riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The congressional committee recommended bringing charges against Trump that largely line up with the indictment Smith ultimately brought.

Like Willis’s indictment, the case includes the false elector scheme. In addition to Georgia, the indictment includes activity in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and other states where Trump lost and tried to overturn the results.

What’s next: A trial date hasn’t yet been set, but the case is being overseen by US District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who has overseen numerous criminal trials of January 6 rioters.

People walking outside Mar-a-Lago in March 2017

People walking outside Mar-a-Lago in March 2017

Darren Samuelsohn



The Justice Department’s investigation into classified documents

The parties: Smith brought an indictment against Trump and his aide Waltine Nauta in a Florida federal court in June. He later slapped Trump with a superseding indictment that added Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira as a co-defendant. They’ve all pleaded not guilty in the case, which is expected to go to trial in mid-2024.

The issues: Early in 2022, Trump turned over 15 boxes of documents — including some marked as classified and “top secret” — to the National Archives. But federal investigators scrutinizing the former president’s handling of records reportedly grew suspicious that Trump or people close to him still retained some key records. The FBI seized about a dozen boxes of additional documents during a raid of Mar-a-Lago last summer.

The Mar-a-Lago case and a separate January 6 investigation are both being overseen by special prosecutor Jack Smith, whom US Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed in November. Smith’s team has been collecting evidence that would help support a case that Trump knowingly retained the records sought by the government, and obstructed efforts to return them.

According to the indictment — which brings 37 criminal counts against Trump — Trump violated the Espionage Act 31 times by illegally holding on to sensitive national-security documents, conspired to obstruct justice, lied to law enforcement, and violated three different statutes related to withholding and concealing government records.

Nauta and De Oliviera often at Trump’s direction, helped hide documents, the indictment says. Nauta also lied to law enforcement about his actions, according to prosecutors.

What’s next: US District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee who previously made rulings sympathetic to him, is presiding over the case. Because it involves complicated legal issues related to classified documents and presidential powers, the case may be delayed until after the 2024 election.

Former President Donald Trump, left. adult film star Stormy Daniels, center. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, right.

Former President Donald Trump, left. adult film star Stormy Daniels, center. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, right.

Alex Brandon/AP, left. Markus Schreiber/AP, center. Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/AP, right.



The Manhattan DA’s indictment over the hush-money settlement to Stormy Daniels

The parties: District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg and Donald Trump.

The issues: Bragg’s office investigated whether Trump violated campaign finance laws in connection to hush money payments made to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. A grand jury voted to bring criminal charges against Trump in the case.

Michael Cohen, Trump’s former fixer and personal lawyer, is a key witness. He has testified under oath that he made the payments to Daniels at Trump’s direction, and pleaded guilty to federal campaign finance violations in connection with the payments in 2018. 

What’s next: Trump was arrested in Manhattan criminal court on April 4 and was arraigned. He is facing 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

The judge scheduled a March 2024 trial.

Former president Donald Trump is pictured with his former CFO Allen Weisselberg

Trump with his former CFO Allen Weisselberg at Trump Tower.

Evan Vucci/AP



The Trump Organization Payroll Case 

The Parties: The Trump Organization was found guilty of 17 tax fraud counts on December 6, 2022 in a speedy, slam-dunk conviction in New York state court.

The Issues: A four-woman, eight-man, mostly working-class jury held Trump’s real estate and golf resort business criminally liable for a 2005-2018 tax-dodge scheme admittedly run by the company’s two top financial executives.

The two, former CFO Allen Weisselberg and top payroll executive Jeffrey McConney, helped themselves and a half-dozen other company execs cheat on their income taxes by paying them in part with pricey perks and benefits — including free use of luxury cars and apartments — that were never reported to tax authorities.

What’s next: Potential repercussions include a heightened hesitancy among banks to lend to a company with felony status and an energized Trump probe in the Manhattan district attorney’s office. Government corruption watchdogs also have renewed reason to urge the federal government to cease doing business with the former president.

Civil lawsuits against Trump

The front page of the lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James accusing former President Donald Trump, his family and his business of a decade of padding his net worth to secure hundreds of millions of dollars in bank loans and tax breaks.

The front page of the lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James accusing former President Donald Trump, his family and his business of a decade of padding his net worth to secure hundreds of millions of dollars in bank loans and tax breaks.

Jon Elswick/AP



The NY AG’s civil case against the Trump family and Trump Organization

The parties: New York Attorney General Letitia James has sued Trump, his family, and the Trump Organization.

The issues: James says she has uncovered a decade-long pattern of financial wrongdoing at Trump’s multi-billion-dollar real-estate and golf resort empire.

She alleges Trump inflated the values of his properties by billions of dollars in financial filings used to secure hundreds of millions of dollars in bank loans. She also alleges he low-balled his properties’ worth for tax breaks. Trump has derided the AG’s efforts as a politically motivated witch hunt.

The 220-page lawsuit arose from a three-year investigation and seeks multiple, corporation-crippling demands that will be decided by a Manhattan judge in October.

James wants the company to pay back the $250 million Trump allegedly pocketed through misleading banks. She also seeks to ban Trump and his three eldest children — Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Eric Trump, who have all served as Trump Organization executives — from ever running a company in New York state again.

Perhaps most extremely, her lawsuit seeks to pull the Trump Organization’s New York papers of incorporation. That charter lets Trump draw revenue from his New York properties, including the lucrative commercial rents at his Manhattan skyscrapers. 

These measures would run Trump’s corporate headquarters out of New York and could put the Trump Organization out of business entirely

What’s next: New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron has warned Trump’s side that the trial will start on time — on Monday, October 2, 2023 — “come hell or high water.” 

Supporters of US President Donald Trump protest inside the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, in Washington, DC

Supporters of then-President Donald Trump protest inside the US Capitol.

Brent Stirton/Getty Images



Lawsuits alleging ‘incitement’ on January 6

The Parties: House Democrats and two Capitol police officers accused Trump of inciting the violent mob on January 6.

The Issues: Trump’s lawyers have argued that his time as president grants him immunity that shields him from civil liability in connection with his January 6 address at the Ellipse, where he urged supporters to “fight like hell.”

A federal judge rejected Trump’s bid to dismiss the civil lawsuits, ruling that his rhetoric on January 6 was “akin to telling an excited mob that corn-dealers starve the poor in front of the corn-dealer’s home.”

US District Judge Amit Mehta said Trump later displayed a tacit agreement with the mob minutes after rioters breached the Capitol when he sent a tweet admonishing then-Vice President Mike Pence for lacking the “courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country.”

What’s Next: Trump has appealed Mehta’s ruling to the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. His lawyers have argued that the immunity afforded to the former president cannot be “undercut if the presidential act in question is unpopular among the judiciary.” The Justice Department says Trump’s actions aren’t covered by presidential immunity. The appeals court heard oral arguments in December but hasn’t yet issued a decision. 

Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll is pictured in 2020.

Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll is suing Trump for rape and defamation.

Seth Wenig/AP



E. Jean Carroll’s rape and defamation case against Trump

The Parties: Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll is suing Trump for defamation, battery, and emotional distress in federal court in Manhattan.  

The Issues: Carroll filed two lawsuits against Trump.

Both lawsuits allege Trump defamed her after she publicly accused him of raping her in a Bergdorf-Goodman dressing room in Manhattan in the mid-90s. Trump responded to Carroll’s rape claim by saying it was untrue and that she was “not my type.” Trump also denied ever meeting Carroll, despite a photo to the contrary.

The first lawsuit was filed in 2019, while Trump was in office, and has been tangled up over legal questions of whether Trump disparaged Carroll as part of his presidential duties, which would make him immune to the lawsuit.

After Trump made more disparaging remarks about Carroll last fall, she filed a second defamation lawsuit against him. That lawsuit also included a rape allegation following the passage of a New York law that gave sexual assault accusers a new window to file civil cases regardless of when the alleged incident occurred.

The second lawsuit went to trial in April. A jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation and awarded Carroll $5 million.

What’s next: After Trump lost the trial, he repeated the same insults against Carroll. Carroll added new defamation claims to her first lawsuit. In July, the Justice Department dropped its argument that Trump disparaged Carroll as part of his presidential duties, paving the way for a second trial to be held in January. 

Donald Trump, right, sits with his children, from left, Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Ivanka Trump during a groundbreaking ceremony for the Trump International Hotel on July 23, 2014, in Washington.

Donald Trump, right, sits with his children, from left, Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Ivanka Trump during a groundbreaking ceremony for the Trump International Hotel in Washington.

Evan Vucci/AP



The ‘multi-level marketing’ pyramid scheme case

The Parties: Lead plaintiff Catherine McKoy and three others sued Trump, his business, and his three eldest children, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and Ivanka Trump, in 2018 in federal court in Manhattan.

The Issues: Donald Trump is accused of promoting a scam multi-level marketing scheme on “The Celebrity Apprentice.” The lawsuit alleges Trump pocketed $8.8 million from the scheme — but that they lost thousands of dollars. Trump’s side has complained that the lawsuit is a politically motivated attack. 

What’s Next: The case is scheduled to go to trial in January 2024.

Michael Cohen

Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney, has claimed Trump sent him to prison to silence him.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images



Michael Cohen’s ‘imprisonment’ case

The Parties: Michael Cohen sued Donald Trump, former Attorney General Bill Barr, and more than a dozen federal prison officials and employees, in federal court in Manhattan in 2021.

The Issues: The president’s former personal attorney is seeking $20 million in damages relating to the time he spent in prison for financial crimes and lying to Congress about Trump’s dealings in Congress. 

Cohen claimed he had been moved to home confinement for three months in the spring of 2020 due to the pandemic but was then vindictively thrown into solitary confinement when he refused to stop speaking to the press and writing a tell-all book about his former boss. A judge ordered him released after 16 days.

What’s Next: The case was dismissed in November, but Cohen filed an appeal.

Singer Eddie Grant performs in concert in honor of Nelson Mandela in Hyde Park, London June 27, 2008.

Singer Eddy Grant sued Trump for copyright infringement.

Andrew Winning/Reuters



The Electric Avenue copyright case

The Parties: Eddy Grant, the composer/performer behind the 80s disco-reggae mega-hit “Electric Avenue,” sued Donald Trump and his campaign in federal court in Manhattan in 2020.

The Issues: Grant is seeking $300,000 for copyright infringement. He claims Trump made unauthorized use of the 1983 dance floor staple during the 2020 campaign. About 40 seconds of the song played in the background of a Biden-bashing animation that Trump posted to his Twitter account. The animation was viewed 13 million times before being taken down a month later. 

Trump has countered that the animation was political satire and so is exempt from copyright infringement claims. He’s also said that the campaign merely reposted the animation and that he has no idea where it came from.

Trump was deposed last year, but it’s unclear where or when exactly. Lawyers for Trump and Grant have agreed to a strict gag order in the case and have repeatedly declined to comment. 

What’s Next: The case is slowly winding its way toward trial; an April 24 deadline has been set for the sides to exchange evidence.

Lawsuits brought by Trump 

Mary Trump speaking on MSNBC on August 8, 2022

Donald Trump’s niece Mary Trump.

MSNBC



Donald Trump v. Mary Trump and the New York Times

The Parties: The former president counter-sued his niece Mary Trump — and the New York Times — in 2021 in New York state court.

The Issues: Mary Trump, the Times, and three of its reporters “maliciously conspired” against him, Trump alleged, by collaborating with the Times on its expose of and breaching the confidentiality of the family’s 2001 settlement of the estate of Mary Trump’s father, Fred Trump Sr.

What’s Next: A judge tossed the claims against the New York Times and its reporters but hasn’t yet ruled on Mary Trump’s motion to dismiss the case.

Hillary Clinton sits at a table.

A judge called Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton “frivolous.”

Photo by: Mike Smith/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images



Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton

The Parties: Trump sued Hillary Clinton, her campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and prominent Democrats including former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and former Clinton campaign chair John Podesta in a federal court in southern Florida in March 2022.

The Issues:  Trump alleged that Clinton and her campaign staff conspired to harm his 2016 run for president by promoting a “contrived Trump-Russia link.” 

A judge tossed the massive lawsuit in September, calling it “a two-hundred-page political manifesto” in which Trump detailed “his grievances against those that have opposed him.” He ordered Trump and his attorney to pay nearly $1 million in sanctions in January.

What’s Next: Trump promised to appeal the dismissal, but it’s unlikely he’ll be successful given the sanctions he’s faced in this case.

Camila DeChalus and C. Ryan Barber contributed to a previous version of this story.